If we are just talking about an panoplied suit that augment a human ’s strength and weaponry , then we ’re extremely close . But if we ’re talk about something with all of the chief abilities of Iron Man ’s character ( i.e. flight , clean infinite big businessman , and repulsor irradiation ) , that may never become a world . The current version in the funny books is even more insane than the one in the movies — the suit of clothes ’s made almost wholly of nanites , which can fix or duplicate themselves and any weaponry on the fly .
So how tight are we ? First , I ’ll fall apart down the affair we ( unfortunately ) can not do , and then , I ’ll treat you to some really awesome stuff and nonsense we can .
The Stuff We Can’t Do
We just can not have a fly suit of clothes like Iron Man ’s . Not exactly , anyway . The main reason for this is the tiny rocket engines and repulsor beams . I go into quite a bit of detail about the flight systems of the lawsuit as they are describe in the strip and a piece about the technology as it was laid out generation by propagation from Iron Man Mark I to VIII+ here .
One of the key component part of the Iron Man courtship is its repulsor beams , and that ’s a kind of technology we may not have anything like for a very farseeing clock time ( if ever ) . The only logical explanation is that they are some sort of graviton operator . This is so far out of our current technical kingdom that we ca n’t evenbegin to guess how it could possibly be done with what we currently know .
It is not only clear how the courtship ’s reactor works . It ’s smaller than a soda pop can , but can produce more power than the miniature reactor on a Virginia course atomic torpedo . It has something to do with zero decimal point muscularity and a continuous ego sustaining chemical reaction that would appear to break most rule of thermodynamics that we know of . It could perhaps be some case of cold fusion reaction , but again , we have no clue how to even begin doing this in such a small size of it . No chemical reaction is 100 % efficient , so the waste heat alone from such a nuclear reactor would likely be enough to cook the person inside the suit .
What We Can Do
Okay . So that was a snatch of a letdown . Now , whatcould we do ? The answer is , in reality , a lot !
We could almost just copy the original Mark 1 prototype armor from the comedian either right now ( today ) or in the next few years .
The Mark 1 above is not all that different from Raytheons XOS 2 powered armour lawsuit below . It ’s stronger than a man and has heavier armor than a person could otherwise take .
The video below shows how the heighten military capability from the exoskeleton provide a soldier to swipe 200 pounds without any effort at all . A soldier would also then be able to carry a much heavier pack and armour . last , the courting reduces fatigue even for forcible activities like pushups . In other parole , it does all the work for him .
A prototype design conception for succeeding growth , which can also be seen in the desktop of the video above , dwell below .
Not to be surpass , Lockheed Martin has its own powered suit of clothes shout HULC .
It has less overall strength but still reportedly countenance a soldier to carry a 200 pound load , and it seems they have work units that can operate untethered . Still , there ’s no word on how much of that 200 - pound load is currently being give to batteries .
While nothing like an Arc Reactor , we do expect a tethered reading that could walk alongside a vehicle carry the causa ’s generator in three to five years . In this case , it would mostly be used to filch heavy material in and out of vehicle for deployed soldiers . This would appropriate a very small squad to rearm a fomite or chopper in the athletic field , while still allowing them to quickly unlade bulk supplies and move on out of harms mode . In six to 10 , year they expect to be capable to power the courtship with its own internal power provision . The most restricting factor is battery engineering science , but that is slowly meliorate .
We would have hassle with finding a mightiness source and would need to recharge frequently . This is in reality okay because the Mark 1 had the precise same issue ! The Mark one used “ transistor ” ( capacitors they meant possibly ? ) to power the suit of clothes and let it to be charge rapidly from any wall outlet . Unfortunately it ran out of succus very often . Still so far so good . You did n’t expect us to bulge out with a Mark VIII dynamic nanite colony courtship did you ?
As I stated before , we ca n’t have flight like the Iron Man from the movies , but the Mark 1 did n’t have that capability either . Supposedly , it was still able to make little leap or bursts of flight of steps using “ press airwave . ” We have really had designs standardised to this for decades .
The military designed a series of “ jump jets ” or “ rocket belts ” that used a extremely concentrated mix of atomic number 1 peroxide along with a catalyse agentive role to create jet of high intensity steam , allowing a person to aviate mostly vertically — precisely what the Mark 1 did . Some other modeling used melted N rather . Either one can be pestilent if the fuel army tank ruptures , and being dissolve by 90 % pure hydrogen peroxide or frozen by liquid N is not a pleasant elbow room to go .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmdfncMk2P0
Okay , so that is obviously very coolheaded but with a flight fourth dimension value in seconds and a public record of only 150 feet , this wo n’t do for a superhero or a soldier .
embark the Martin Technology JetPack .
In this video we see the gadget go up to 5,000 feet and deploy an emergency chute at 3,000 foot . This was actually fell by remote command in a pursuer helicopter with a dummy , but that also shows how a navigation calculator or helper could aid with flight in an hand brake . The escape organization is bulky but it could be attach to the XOS and used to insert hostile territorial dominion . After you arrive , you park it somewhere invisible and move in to deal out some Iron Man - style jurist . Just do n’t leave where you park .
last , if all that was n’t enough for anyone dreaming of hang glide like a jet as opposed to a tiny chopper , there is one last choice .
Yves “ Jetman ” Rossy has pioneer a wearable spirt flight large number . It has the drawback of not being powerful enough to reach flight of steps altitude on its own , but once in the aviation , it can perform take on some telling flight .
As daring innovators like these continue to create awe-inspiring devices , it is only a issue of time before some character of human - scale of measurement personal flight arrangement becomes viable .
In conclusion…
Yes , we could expect something very exchangeable to Iron Man in the next 3 - 15 years if we are willing to settle for the Iron Man Mark I suit .
The number of ways in which such a gimmick could change the battlefield or dangerous police and hand brake rescue operations is almost too many to heel . We could also have versions of these suit in function at factories and manufacturing plant around the macrocosm . We would n’t need a forklift or dolly any longer for those childlike yet tiring Job , we wouldbecome the forklift . The benefit to workers on assembly lines would also be enormous as workers would get fatigued much less often and injuries from strains would be very uncommon .
finally technology will let these suits to mold without the human being at all — but that is still a long agency off . Or is it ?
How tight are we to a genuine Iron Man suit?originally appear onQuora . you may comply Quora onTwitter , Facebook , andGoogle+ .
This answer has been lightly edited for grammar and uncloudedness .
Iron ManmilitaryQUORAsuperheros
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and civilization word in your inbox daily .
News from the future , birth to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
