When you buy through links on our internet site , we may garner an affiliate perpetration . Here ’s how it works .
A extragalactic nebula that is supposedly innocent of all gloomy matter might in reality be full of it .
And that , paradoxically , could imply dark matter does n’t exist .
A small galaxy called NGC1052-DF2 was previously thought to lack dark matter. A new paper suggests it might have dark matter after all.
What ? ! Back in March , a team of astrophysicistspublished a paperin the journal Nature claiming to have found a galaxy lackingdark matter — a conjectural form of invisible thing that seems to exert gravitative pull without interact with light .
Scientists have suggested the beingness of this bizarre topic to explain a just - as - bizarre phenomenon : Based on the light uranologist can see with their telescopes , the world acts like there is much more aggregated , and therefore much more gravitative force , than Albert Einstein ’s theories predict establish on what we can see .
The Nature paper was big tidings . It would have been the first such object ever find in the universe . Moreover , it seemed to grapple a death blow to an alternative theory explaining the weirdness of the macrocosm : In that theory , gravity itself just acts a little other than than we ( and Einstein ) mean . If gravity is a piffling different than Einstein ’s equations advise , then it should be dissimilar everywhere in the universe — including in this on the face of it colored - matter - free galaxy — not just in some places .
Now , a 2d squad of physicist has place a newspaper to the preprintjournal arXivclaiming that this beetleweed do as if it has dark affair after all . If true , that would mean that the leadingalternative to dour mattermight still be true .
However , the new arXiv paper has n’t yet been peer review , and the authors of the March Nature newspaper do n’t concord with the 2nd newspaper ’s conclusions .
Dark matter or something else?
The original paper from March base its stunning claim of a dark - matter - free galaxy on the fashion clusters of asterisk moved through the lean , diffuse galaxy called NGC1052 – DF2 : They appeared to move at on the dot the speed Einstein ’s equations of general relativity theory would predict base on the visible matter ( so , slower than they would if the galaxy held glowering subject ) .
This unexampled paper on arXiv suggested otherwise : First , the authors pointed out that NGC1052 – DF2 was already strike mode back in 1976 and has antecedently been bear on to by three different names : KKSG04 , PGC3097693 and [ KKS2000]04 .
Then , using those gens and then finding all the available data point on the coltsfoot , the investigator argue that the research worker from the March report just mismeasured the distance between that galaxy and Earth . This stand for the galax is likely much closer to us than the original researchers thought .
astronomer calculate the flock of galaxies based on the objects ' brightness and distance . If the galaxy examined in the composition is tightlipped to Earth than antecedently suppose , then its duskiness mean it ’s also much less massive than investigator thought . And at the newly forecast , lighter mass , all the other features of the galaxy make a lot more good sense , the research worker in the new paper sound out . Its globular cluster are n’t move slowly because they ’re in some strange glowering affair - desert ; instead , they ’re actuate at the veritable stop number for a very lightweight galaxy , the arXiv authors say . [ The 18 expectant Unsolved Mysteries in Physics ]
However , Pieter van Dokkum , an astrophysicist at Yale University and the first author of the March Nature paper , enounce the newfangled arXiv analysis is blemished .
" The central distance mensuration comes from theHubble Space Telescopedata , and it looks like they be amiss it . The argument is a bit technical , but fundamentally , they mistook pixel variations for individual star . If NGC1052 - DF2 were as close as they exact , then the wandflower would be resolve into a sea of private sensation , " but it ’s not , Van Dokkum told Live Science in an e-mail .
However , Ignacio Trujillo , an astrophysicist at the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias and the first author of the new arXiv paper , say he and his colleagues stand by their estimates . Many case-by-case whiz can be seen in image of NGC1052 - DF2 when the line is changed in effigy , Trujillo narrate Live Science in an e-mail .
In increase , " our paper not only uses a standard for estimate the distance to the galaxy , but up to five unlike ( and completely independent ) methods , and all of them converge to the same identification number , " he said .
The gist of the (dark) matter
There ’s something deep going on , though , than a dispute about the movement in a small , far-off galaxy : a fight about theexistence of drear matteritself . research worker who argued that NGC1052 – DF2 ( or DF2 for short ) does n’t turn back dark thing were seen as offering evidence that dark matter really does live in the universe — recall , the alternative hypothesis need gravity to comport otherwise in all places .
Since at least the 1980s , a group of astrophysicists has indicate that the whole estimation of dark affair is wrong skill , as Live Sciencereported in March . The dark matter marriage offer is basically an untestable idea , these scientist argue , that can bespeculated aboutforever but never disproven . And while research worker have seensome collateral evidence of dingy matterin addition to its twist on distant stars and galaxy , they have never beguile a exclusive sherd of the material or otherwise immediately manifest its being , skeptics have argued .
Most dark - matter skeptic are interested in the alternative theory , in which gravity is a slight off - kelter . call " Modified Newtonian Dynamics " ( MOND ) , the theory suggests a suite of tweaks to the laws of physical science at galactic scales that extinguish the motive for disconsolate affair . If the true laws of solemnity are just a bit different than what you ’d currently happen in cathartic textbooks , these scientists fence , perhaps dark issue is n’t necessary to explain the behavior of the universe after all .
When the paper on NGC1052 - DF2 came out in March , it was presented as MOND ’s death knell . Finding one galaxy without moody matter does n’t disprove the existence of dark matter , just like a desert does n’t disprove the existence of lake . But MOND does n’t have that sumptuousness ; if the modified physical laws are real , they have to be reproducible throughout the population . In other words , if one galaxy follow non - MOND laws of physics without the influence of moody topic , then MOND ca n’t be true .
For that reason , DF2 " reckon on the surface to be another nail in the coffin of MOND , " Kathryn Zurek , an astrophysicist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California , who did not work on either paper , save in an email to Live Science in March .
That was how most physicist reacted .
But not everyone .
Stacy McGaugh , an astrophysicist at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio , who has puzzle out on both dark matter and MOND but did not play on either recent paper , was disbelieving .
In a follow - up interview in April , McGaugh told Live Science that the DF2 claims did n’t account for the " external field burden " — a MOND tweak that would allow a large nearby coltsfoot to determine DF2 ’s behavior — suggest that MOND had n’t suffered the snow some had evoke .
He also said the DF2 title were based on some confutable statistic : The researcher measured the upper of just 10 object in the galaxy to forecast DF2 ’s overall velocity , excluding one object that behaved very differently from the others . McGaugh said that excluding unusual person is sometimes reasonable but that in this case , his calculations showed that include that very dissimilar objective changed the composition ’s conclusions dramatically . With the object leave out , the galax is inconsistent with MOND . With the physical object include in the calculations , the whole galaxy front a plenty more normal , McGaugh said .
Now , with this fresh arXiv paper , which still has n’t been reviewed by compeer scientist , there are new arguments against a dark - matter - free coltsfoot — and the very existence of dark matter — but these arguments have spurred extra arguments . The moody topic saga continues .
earlier published onLive skill .
